search

Julie Struplova vs Carolina Kuhl Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Struplova vs Kuhl analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Julie Struplova vs Carolina Kuhl Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Struplova 0 - 0 Kuhl

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Struplova has won 46.5% of points on his second serve, while Kuhl has won 45.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Struplova, in recent form, has won 56.04% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kuhl has won 60.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.68% and 42.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Struplova has saved 51.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kuhl has saved 45.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Struplova has won 60.61% of matches played (W/L 40/ 26), with Kuhl winning 61.54% (W/L 40/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Struplova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 86/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kuhl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10).
  • Player level: In the last year, Struplova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 40/ 26), where as Kuhl has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.32% of matches (W/L 26/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Struplova has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.21 while Kuhl has played against players with an average rank of 317.54.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Struplova has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kuhl has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Struplova has converted 47.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kuhl has converted 56.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365
Julie Struplova

3

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

1

Minor

264

Rank

262

High

19

Age

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

396

Rank

396

High

19

Age

Plays

Carolina Kuhl

3

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L W W W W W L L

Form

W L W W L W L W L L

66% (99-52)

Career Total W/L

60% (59-40)

54% (13-11)

YTD W/L

58% (21-15)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Struplova VS Kuhl H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-1 2-6 6-1
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
57% ( 37 of 65)
1st Serve %
59% ( 40 of 68)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
65% ( 24 of 37)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 19 of 40)
32% ( 9 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 10 of 28)
53% ( 8 of 15)
Break Points Won
56% ( 5 of 9)
49% ( 32 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 39 of 68)
72
Total Points Won
61

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Julie Struplova Carolina Kuhl
YTD W/L 54% (13/11) 58% (21/15)
Sets Win/Loss 51% (28/27) 59% (47/33)
Games Win/Loss 51% (264/258) 56% (396/313)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 71% (5/2)
Clay Win/Loss 63% (12/7) 50% (6/6)
Indoor Hard W/L 20% (1/4) 59% (10/7)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.09 0.25
Aces Total 22 85
DFs per game 0.2 0.25
DFs Total 51 85
Avg Match Time 2:2:2 1:42:47
Avg Opp Rank 285.5 273.61
1st Serve % 69% (1229/1794) 63% (1425/2273)
1st Serve W% 55% (670/1229) 61% (874/1425)
2nd Serve W% 47% (264/564) 46% (391/848)
BPs Won% Total 48% (114/240) 57% (176/311)
Return Pts W% 48% (849/1779) 50% (1144/2305)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 54% (13/11) 52% (12/11)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 75% (9/3)
Best of 3 Sets W% 54% (13/24) 60% (21/35)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 38% (3/8) 17% (1/6)
Deciding Set W% 71% (5/7) 44% (4/9)
1st set W, W 83% (12/10) 83% (23/19)
1st set W, L 17% (12/2) 17% (23/4)
1st set L, W 25% (12/3) 15% (13/2)

Julie Struplova Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Julie Struplova
59% ( 39 of 66)
1st Serve %
59% ( 47 of 79)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
62% ( 24 of 39)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 23 of 47)
52% ( 14 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 14 of 32)
33% ( 5 of 15)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
42% ( 28 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 42 of 79)
80
Total Points Won
65
L
7-6(3) 6-2 H2H
SF
cross
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Julie Struplova
61% ( 28 of 46)
1st Serve %
64% ( 30 of 47)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 14 of 30)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
33% ( 15 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
57
Total Points Won
36
L
6-4 6-0 H2H
QF
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Tamara Zidansek
76% ( 94 of 123)
1st Serve %
58% ( 61 of 106)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
55% ( 52 of 94)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 27 of 61)
34% ( 10 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 22 of 45)
56% ( 10 of 18)
Break Points Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
50% ( 61 of 123)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 57 of 106)
119
Total Points Won
110
W
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
81% ( 87 of 108)
1st Serve %
58% ( 91 of 157)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
13
53% ( 46 of 87)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 46 of 91)
38% ( 8 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 28 of 66)
32% ( 9 of 28)
Break Points Won
70% ( 7 of 10)
50% ( 54 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 83 of 157)
137
Total Points Won
128
W
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
67% ( 82 of 123)
1st Serve %
67% ( 80 of 120)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
63% ( 52 of 82)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 51 of 80)
49% ( 20 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 20 of 40)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
41% ( 51 of 123)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 49 of 120)
121
Total Points Won
122
W
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(5) H2H
QF
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Gabriela Skrabalova
59% ( 24 of 41)
1st Serve %
60% ( 28 of 47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71% ( 17 of 24)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
76% ( 13 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 5 of 19)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 11 of 41)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 27 of 47)
57
Total Points Won
31
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Karolina Mrazikova
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve %
77% ( 37 of 48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63% ( 19 of 30)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
72% ( 13 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 6 of 11)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
33% ( 16 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 25 of 48)
57
Total Points Won
39
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
SF
cross
Nina Vargova
Player
Julie Struplova
70% ( 71 of 102)
1st Serve %
74% ( 89 of 121)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
61% ( 43 of 71)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 44 of 89)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
66% ( 21 of 32)
33% ( 6 of 18)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
40% ( 41 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 56 of 121)
117
Total Points Won
106
L
6-7(5) 6-1 7-6(4) H2H
QF
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Alice Rame
75% ( 63 of 84)
1st Serve %
56% ( 36 of 64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
59% ( 37 of 63)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
52% ( 11 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
43% ( 36 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 29 of 64)
77
Total Points Won
71
W
6-2 2-6 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Julie Struplova
Player
Sandra Samir
79% ( 68 of 86)
1st Serve %
52% ( 43 of 82)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
50% ( 34 of 68)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 20 of 43)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 16 of 39)
47% ( 8 of 17)
Break Points Won
56% ( 5 of 9)
50% ( 43 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 46 of 82)
89
Total Points Won
79
W
7-5 6-3 H2H

Carolina Kuhl Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Carolina Kuhl
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
56% ( 35 of 62)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 21 of 35)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
32% ( 18 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 30 of 62)
69
Total Points Won
50
L
7-6(1) 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Carolina Kuhl
67% ( 35 of 52)
1st Serve %
65% ( 33 of 51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71% ( 25 of 35)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 16 of 33)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
37% ( 19 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 27 of 51)
60
Total Points Won
43
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Anali Kocevar
69% ( 36 of 52)
1st Serve %
56% ( 20 of 36)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78% ( 28 of 36)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 11 of 20)
44% ( 7 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 5 of 16)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
33% ( 17 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 20 of 36)
55
Total Points Won
33
W
6-0 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
69% ( 61 of 88)
1st Serve %
56% ( 48 of 86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
44% ( 27 of 61)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 27 of 48)
59% ( 16 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 14 of 38)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
58% ( 7 of 12)
51% ( 45 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 45 of 86)
88
Total Points Won
86
L
2-6 6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Melisa Ercan
48% ( 28 of 58)
1st Serve %
55% ( 38 of 69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
64% ( 18 of 28)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 21 of 38)
50% ( 15 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 10 of 31)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
43% ( 25 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 38 of 69)
71
Total Points Won
56
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Jil Teichmann
Player
Carolina Kuhl
58% ( 33 of 57)
1st Serve %
48% ( 22 of 46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73% ( 24 of 33)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 17 of 22)
63% ( 15 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 8 of 24)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
32% ( 18 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 21 of 46)
60
Total Points Won
43
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Angelica Raggi
73% ( 32 of 44)
1st Serve %
50% ( 27 of 54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
78% ( 25 of 32)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 9 of 27)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 13 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 31 of 54)
62
Total Points Won
36
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Alessandra Mazzola
60% ( 59 of 98)
1st Serve %
60% ( 34 of 57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
49% ( 29 of 59)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 19 of 34)
51% ( 20 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
13% ( 3 of 23)
80% ( 8 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 6 of 15)
50% ( 49 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 35 of 57)
84
Total Points Won
71
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72% ( 58 of 81)
1st Serve %
67% ( 50 of 75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
57% ( 33 of 58)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 21 of 50)
35% ( 8 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 13 of 25)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
46% ( 6 of 13)
49% ( 40 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 41 of 75)
82
Total Points Won
74
L
1-6 6-2 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Viola Turini
62% ( 68 of 109)
1st Serve %
58% ( 56 of 96)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
51% ( 35 of 68)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 30 of 56)
51% ( 21 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 15 of 40)
64% ( 9 of 14)
Break Points Won
55% ( 6 of 11)
49% ( 53 of 109)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 51 of 96)
107
Total Points Won
98
W
4-6 7-5 6-0 H2H

Struplova Vs Kuhl Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions